Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Hangfire VS Amazon SQS

Compare Hangfire VS Amazon SQS and see what are their differences

Hangfire logo Hangfire

An easy way to perform background processing in .NET and .NET Core applications.

Amazon SQS logo Amazon SQS

Amazon Simple Queue Service is a fully managed message queuing service.
  • Hangfire Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04
  • Amazon SQS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-22

Hangfire features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Hangfire offers a simple and straightforward setup, allowing developers to quickly implement background processing without extensive configuration.
  • Reliable Background Processing
    It ensures reliable and persistent task execution, meaning tasks will not be lost in server restarts or crashes, thanks to its persistent storage options.
  • Dashboard Monitoring
    Hangfire comes with a built-in dashboard that provides a real-time view of all running jobs, their status, and history, aiding in monitoring and debugging.
  • Scalability
    It supports horizontal scaling by allowing multiple servers to process the queue, ensuring that load can be distributed effectively.
  • Flexibility with Recurring Jobs
    Hangfire offers flexible scheduling options for recurring jobs, similar to CRON jobs, allowing for different time intervals and complex scheduling scenarios.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source tool, Hangfire allows for community contributions, bug fixes, and improvements, as well as customization by developers.

Possible disadvantages of Hangfire

  • Database Dependency
    Hangfire requires a database to store jobs and their statuses, which might lead to additional infrastructure and maintenance overhead.
  • Limited Language Support
    Hangfire is built specifically for .NET applications, which limits its use to developers working within the .NET ecosystem.
  • Complex Scaling Scenarios
    While scalable, implementing Hangfire in very large or complex deployments can require intricate setup and configuration, especially around job storage and processing.
  • Potential Performance Overhead
    The dependency on a database for storing job states and potential contention on the background job processing can sometimes introduce performance overhead.
  • Licensing Costs
    For extended features and professional support, Hangfire offers commercial licenses, which may introduce additional costs beyond the open-source version.

Amazon SQS features and specs

  • Scalability
    Amazon SQS scales automatically to handle an unlimited number of messages, ensuring that your application can support any level of demand without manual intervention.
  • Reliability
    Amazon SQS offers guaranteed delivery of messages, with multiple copies of each message stored redundantly across multiple servers and data centers.
  • Flexibility
    SQS supports both standard and FIFO (First In, First Out) queues, giving you the option to choose the type of queue that best suits your application's requirements.
  • Ease of Use
    Amazon SQS is fully managed, meaning you don't need to worry about provisioning or managing infrastructure. Integration is straightforward with a well-documented API.
  • Cost-Effective
    SQS follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you only pay for the number of calls made to the API and the amount of data transferred, making it a cost-effective solution for many use cases.
  • Security
    SQS integrates with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) to control access. Additionally, it supports encryption of messages in transit and at rest, enhancing security.

Possible disadvantages of Amazon SQS

  • Message Limitation
    Each SQS message can body can be up to 256 KB in size during one API call, which might be restrictive for certain applications that require larger message payloads.
  • Latency
    Though generally fast, there can be latency in message delivery, especially when compared to more direct communication methods like WebSocket or gRPC.
  • Complexity in Handling Large Number of Messages
    While SQS can handle a large number of messages, managing a very high throughput can become complex, requiring careful configuration of multiple queues, message batching, and appropriate back-off and retry logic.
  • Cost for High Volume
    While cost-effective for many scenarios, SQS costs can increase significantly with very high volumes of messages due to the per-request pricing, potentially necessitating budget management.
  • Limited Ordering Guarantees
    Standard queues do not ensure the order of message processing. While FIFO queues provide ordering, they come with limitations in terms of throughput and additional costs.
  • Visibility Timeout
    Incorrectly setting the visibility timeout can result in duplicated message processing or delayed message processing, requiring careful consideration and configuration based on the application's characteristics.

Hangfire videos

AK 47 Wasr Hangfire - shooter beware

Amazon SQS videos

Speed and Reliability at Any Scale: Amazon SQS and Database Services (SVC206) | AWS re:Invent 2013

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Hangfire and Amazon SQS)
Data Integration
36 36%
64% 64
Stream Processing
36 36%
64% 64
Web Service Automation
32 32%
68% 68
Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing

User comments

Share your experience with using Hangfire and Amazon SQS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Hangfire and Amazon SQS

Hangfire Reviews

We have no reviews of Hangfire yet.
Be the first one to post

Amazon SQS Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
Amazon SQS offers standard features such as dead-letter queues and costs allocation tags. With Amazon SQS, you can access the web services API in any programming language that supports the AWS SDK.
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
Amazon SQS (Simple Queue Service) is a fully managed, message queuing service for distributed systems, serverless applications, and microservices. It is known for the dissociation of components and the creation of effective asynchronous processes. It possesses a good SKD and a useful console. Because of its salient features, it is easy to use and hence favored by developers.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Amazon SQS seems to be a lot more popular than Hangfire. While we know about 67 links to Amazon SQS, we've tracked only 5 mentions of Hangfire. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Hangfire mentions (5)

  • Do I need message queues for sending emails/texts via services like SendGrid, AWS SES, Twilio etc.? How do you decide if you need message queues or not? What questions do you ask yourself?
    Hangfire (https://hangfire.io) includes default exception handling and is very extensible, I think it's a good mid-level choice and a good alternative to other queue mechanism, if you can't afford to host a separated queue service or can't manage a separated service; also scales pretty well (you can have multiple servers handling the same background job queue, or different queues). It runs on Sql Server and MySql... Source: over 2 years ago
  • jsonb in postgres and should I use it or not?
    I used to just use hangfire.io in .net and worked wonderfully for any long running tasks or schedules. Had a great queuing system, UI to know if they failed , etc. That's how I'd send emails, pdf's, and other things along that nature. Then if it were more just a db related operation, just setup a schedule in mssql job service. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How can In make a function run at a certain date in the future?
    You can use hangfire for cronjob, to run at a time in future, you can use Hangfire.Schedule(jobid, datetime). Source: over 2 years ago
  • How to handle processing of an entity through different states?
    So another option is to use something like https://hangfire.io to pull the jobs and process them? Source: almost 3 years ago
  • How to update database in a Parallel.For loop?
    I've got a fairly large process I need to handle in background on my .net core web app so I've exported it to a background task using Hangfire. Source: over 3 years ago

Amazon SQS mentions (67)

  • Large-scale Data Processing with Step Functions : AWS Project
    Amazon SQS — Fully managed message queuing for microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • AWS SQS as an alternative to traditional application integration middleware
    When I took my first AWS trainings (AWS Cloud Practitioner and AWS Developer Associate), I was really impressed with the capabilities that AWS offers. One of them was the strong scalability capabilities - the feature that caused problems in some past projects. Since AWS SQS is a managed message queue, I thought it would be a good fit for my use case. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Event-Driven Architecture on AWS
    Event Routers: Services like Amazon SQS (A managed message queuing), Amazon SNS (A pub/sub messaging), AWS Step Functions (An orchestrate serverless workflows) and Amazon EventBridge (A serverless event bus) act as event routers, establishing the paths and flow for messages within the architecture. They enable seamless handling and distribution of events, ensuring that each message reaches its intended destination... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev
    SQS - 1 million messaging queue requests. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Building Mature Content Detection for Mod Tools
    The last stage is productionizing the model. The goal of this phase is to create a system to process each image/video, gather the relevant features and inputs to the models, integrate the models into a hosting service, and relay the corresponding model predictions to downstream consumers like the MCF system. We used an existing Safety service, Content Classification Service, to implement the aforementioned system... Source: about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Hangfire and Amazon SQS, you can also consider the following products

Sidekiq - Sidekiq is a simple, efficient framework for background job processing in Ruby

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Resque - Resque is a Redis-backed Ruby library for creating background jobs, placing them on multiple queues, and processing them later.

Amazon SNS - Fully managed pub/sub messaging for microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications

Enqueue It - Easy and scalable solution for manage and execute background tasks seamlessly in .NET applications. It allows you to schedule, queue, and process your jobs and microservices efficiently.