Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
BIR

FRRouting VS BIRD

Compare FRRouting VS BIRD and see what are their differences

Hyperview
DCIM software reinvented. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

FRRouting logo FRRouting

FRRouting (FRR) is an IP routing protocol suite for Linux and Unix platforms which

BIRD logo BIRD

Enjoy the ride - quick scooter hires for city commutes
  • FRRouting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-20
  • BIRD Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-14

FRRouting features and specs

  • Feature Rich
    FRRouting (FRR) supports a wide array of routing protocols, including OSPF, BGP, RIP, and PIM, making it suitable for a large variety of network configurations.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, FRR is free to use, and it benefits from community contributions and transparency in its development process.
  • High Performance
    FRR is designed to deliver high-performance routing capabilities, which are crucial for maintaining efficiency in large or complex networks.
  • Active Community
    Supported and maintained by an active community, FRR receives regular updates and features improvements, and it has strong documentation and community forums.
  • Interoperability
    FRR can operate on a variety of Linux-based systems and integrates well with other networking tools, aiding in flexibility and adaptability.

Possible disadvantages of FRRouting

  • Complex Configuration
    FRR can be complex to configure, particularly for those who are not experienced with command-line interfaces or network routing concepts.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive feature set, new users may find FRR difficult to master, requiring time and effort to understand its capabilities fully.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running FRR on smaller hardware or constrained environments may prove challenging, as it can require significant system resources for optimal performance.
  • Dependency on Linux
    FRR principally runs on Linux-based systems, which may limit its use in environments that primarily use other operating systems.
  • Limited Vendor Support
    Compared to some commercial solutions, FRR might have limited official vendor support, which can be a consideration for enterprises relying heavily on support services.

BIRD features and specs

  • High Performance
    BIRD is known for its high performance and efficiency in routing, able to handle large amounts of data and multiple routing tables.
  • Versatility
    It supports multiple routing protocols such as BGP, OSPF, and RIP, making it versatile for different network configurations.
  • Customizability
    BIRD offers a flexible configuration language that allows for detailed customization of routing policies and parameters.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, BIRD allows users to freely modify and contribute to its codebase, fostering a collaborative development environment.
  • Active Community
    BIRD has an active community and mailing list, providing support and discussions which can be beneficial for troubleshooting and feature requests.
  • IPv4 and IPv6 Support
    BIRD supports both IPv4 and IPv6, allowing for modern network configurations and future-proofing network management.

Possible disadvantages of BIRD

  • Complexity
    The flexibility offered by BIRD can also lead to complexity in setup and management, which may require a steep learning curve for new users.
  • Limited GUI
    BIRD primarily uses a command-line interface (CLI), which might be less intuitive for users who prefer graphical user interfaces (GUI).
  • Smaller Ecosystem
    Compared to larger commercial routing solutions, BIRD may have a smaller ecosystem of complementary tools and integrations.
  • Support and Documentation
    While documentation exists, users may find it less comprehensive compared to commercial alternatives, potentially leading to difficulties in troubleshooting.
  • Scalability Concerns
    While BIRD performs well in most scenarios, some users may find scalability limitations in extremely large-scale or complex network environments.

FRRouting videos

+ Add

Netdev 0x12 - Introduction to FRRouting - Tutorial

More videos:

  • Review - Netdev 0x13 - FRRouting Workshop

BIRD videos

+ Add

Choosing a Pet Bird - Caique Parrot Review

More videos:

  • Review - BIRD Scooters | How They Work/Review!
  • Review - New Bird One Scooter Review: First Look and First Ride!!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FRRouting and BIRD)

FRRouting

BIRD

Operating Systems
100 100%
Operating Systems
0% 0
Transportation
0 0%
Transportation
100% 100
Linux
100 100%
Linux
0% 0
Web And Application Servers
0 0%
Web And Application Servers
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FRRouting and BIRD. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

BIRD might be a bit more popular than FRRouting. We know about 13 links to it since March 2021 and only 12 links to FRRouting. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FRRouting mentions (12)

  • Advice for a high school networking lab
    FRR https://frrouting.org/ is another open source tool for a more Cisco style CLI syntax. You’d install that on top of most Linux distros. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Flush BGP table faster
    Use a decent PC or three, use https://frrouting.org/ and see fast bgp convergence 8-). Source: over 2 years ago
  • Recommendations on Software-based Traffic Management and Routing Platforms
    Open source, check out freerouter (https://wiki.geant.org/display/RARE/Home) and FRR (https://frrouting.org/). Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Pulling My Hair Out Over Netplan
    u/GamerLymx The setup goal was, originally, to set this up as a desktop testing router using FRRouting so I could experiment with some technologies I work with, namely OpenFabric without having to buy a $6k switch (Extreme Networks) as well as OSPF and EIGRP. However, I ran into some issues with setting up FRRouting and could not find sufficient information out there to overcome those. So I decided to just turn... Source: almost 3 years ago
  • FRRouting and NordVPN
    Has anyone ever setup FRRouting to connect to a consumer VPN such as NordVPN? I have been Googling but have come up empty so I am assuming it is not something that can be done. Just the same, I thought I would ask in case I am asking the question wrong in my searches. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

BIRD mentions (13)

  • Automatic BGP traffic engineering
    At one of my previous employers we wrote some custom software to interface with Quagga. Seems like Quagga has fallen out of favor for things like BIRD. We use our software to monitor for various things and dynamically adjust the path prepends to "shape" the traffic and cause the multihomed traffic to push to different datacenters around the globe. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Reasons a Raspberry Pi Belongs in Your Network Lab
    * [1] https://bird.network.cz/ I'd actually love "enterprise raspberry", some small machine that we could shove 3-6 of them in 1RU, but once you add enterprise tax and all of the doodas to make it manageable (OOB management), it gets expensive enough to rival "just an old server". - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • I can't decide on my router/firewall platform. Which one do you think is the most stable and future proof?
    Currently Wireguard handles all of my VPN connections, but I used OpenVPN and IPsec in the past. I run multiple paths through my VPN network and use BGP to handle the preference and failover between them. I am using BIRD instead of the included OpenBGPD, because I also have some Ubuntu machines that also run it and wanted consistent configs between them but OpenBGPD should also work well. I have not done... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Identity Management for WireGuard
    You can run dynamic routing protocols such as OSPF or iBGP over Wireguard. It's not built in, but that's a feature, not a bug—do one thing and do it well. I have a full mesh of Wireguard tunnels configured between home/office/datacenters/laptop, and run bird[0] on the VPN endpoints to direct traffic between them. [0] https://bird.network.cz/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • How deeply are you able to understand your work?
    I've spent a lot of hours these past few weeks in the docs and codebases for Cilium, Calico, BIRD, MetalLB, PureLB, Longhorn, CephFS, and Rook. Do I understand 100% top-to-bottom how those systems work? No. Do I understand "enough" of how those systems work to produce a good solution to the core business problem we're trying to address? Yes. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FRRouting and BIRD, you can also consider the following products

VyOS - VyOS in an open source Linux-based operating system sold and distributed by Sentrium corporations. It is geared toward IT specialists and network administrators for the purpose of securing network and company data... read more.

Spin - A station-less bikeshare. Pickup and drop off anywhere. 🚲

Quagga - Quagga is a network routing software suite providing implementations of Open Shortest Path First...

Uber Bike - On-demand electric bikes for commuting and exploring

OSRM - Utilities, Application Utilities, and Mapping APIs

BikeSharing - Easily borrow a bike anywhere

Loading...