Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

File Roller VS Xarchiver

Compare File Roller VS Xarchiver and see what are their differences

File Roller logo File Roller

File Roller is an archive manager for the GNOME desktop environment.

Xarchiver logo Xarchiver

Xarchiver, a GTK+2 only frontend to various command line archivers.
  • File Roller Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-25
  • Xarchiver Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-25

File Roller features and specs

  • Integration with GNOME Desktop
    File Roller integrates seamlessly with GNOME Desktop Environment, allowing easy access and extraction of archive files directly from the file manager.
  • Supports Various Formats
    It supports a wide range of archive formats including tar, zip, 7z, rar, iso, and many others, ensuring compatibility with most archive files.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    File Roller provides a simple and intuitive graphical user interface that makes it easy for users to create, modify, and extract archives.
  • Customizable Compression Levels
    Users can customize compression levels for different archive formats, allowing for flexible space and performance management.

Possible disadvantages of File Roller

  • Dependence on GNOME
    File Roller is tailored for the GNOME desktop environment, which can make it less appealing or efficient for users of other desktop environments.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to some specialized archiving tools, File Roller lacks advanced features like automation scripts, archive repair, and specialized encryption options.
  • Performance
    While File Roller is adequate for general use, it may not perform as quickly or efficiently as command-line tools or other specialized software for handling large archives.
  • GUI-Dependent
    File Roller relies on a graphical user interface, which means it cannot be used in environments where a GUI is not available or practical, such as servers or remote systems accessed via SSH.

Xarchiver features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Xarchiver is available on various Unix-like operating systems, making it versatile and accessible for users on different platforms.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The application features a simple and intuitive graphical user interface, which makes archive management easy for both novice and experienced users.
  • Support for Multiple Formats
    Xarchiver supports a wide range of archive formats, including ZIP, RAR, 7Z, TAR, and others, providing flexibility in managing different types of compressed files.
  • Lightweight
    As a lightweight application, Xarchiver consumes minimal system resources, ensuring smooth performance even on low-spec machines.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Xarchiver allows users to inspect the source code, contribute to its development, and ensure transparency in its operation.

Possible disadvantages of Xarchiver

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to some other archive managers, Xarchiver lacks advanced features like built-in encryption or repair tools for damaged archives.
  • Dependency on External Tools
    For handling certain archive formats, Xarchiver depends on external utilities, which might require additional installations and maintenance.
  • No Command-Line Interface
    Xarchiver primarily operates through its graphical interface, lacking a command-line interface which might be preferred by advanced users for automated scripting.
  • Occasional Bugs
    As with many open-source projects, users may encounter occasional bugs or stability issues, especially when new formats or features are introduced.
  • Limited Updates
    Development and updates may be less frequent compared to commercial archive managers, potentially resulting in slower adaptation to new archive standards.

File Roller videos

show files file roller

Xarchiver videos

Xarchiver Top # 5 Facts

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to File Roller and Xarchiver)
Archiver
73 73%
27% 27
Archive Manager
73 73%
27% 27
Data Compression
71 71%
29% 29
HR
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using File Roller and Xarchiver. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Xarchiver seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

File Roller mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of File Roller yet. Tracking of File Roller recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Xarchiver mentions (1)

  • Encryption Tools
    7-Zip is a free and open-source file archiver, which is a software used to compress groups of files. The command-line program p7zip is used on Linux, MacOS, and other platforms, and it integrates into many interfaces such as FileRoller, Xarchiver, and Ark. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing File Roller and Xarchiver, you can also consider the following products

Bandizip - Bandizip : All-In-One Free Zip Archiver. Bandizip is a lightweight, fast and free All-In-One Zip Archiver.

The Unarchiver - Get the top application for archives on Mac. It's a RAR extractor, it allows you to unzip files, and works with dozens of other formats.

Universal Extractor - Universal Extractor is a program designed to decompress and extract files from any type of archive or installer, such as ZIP or RAR files, self-extracting EXE ...

WinZip - The world's best file compressor in the world.

NanaZip - NanaZip is an open source file archiver intended for the modern Windows experience

BetterZip - Extract Only Files You Really Need. Create Archives. Update Archives. Protect Your Data.