Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Control-M VS RunDeck

Compare Control-M VS RunDeck and see what are their differences

Control-M logo Control-M

Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.

RunDeck logo RunDeck

RunDeck is an open source automation service with a web console, command line tools and a WebAPI.
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12
  • RunDeck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-07

Control-M features and specs

  • Comprehensive Job Scheduling
    Control-M provides an extensive range of job scheduling capabilities, supporting various environments and platforms, which ensures that all workflows and batch jobs can be managed consistently and efficiently.
  • Ease of Use
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easier for both technical and non-technical users to manage job workflows without extensive training.
  • Scalability
    Control-M scales effortlessly, accommodating the needs of small businesses to large enterprises, without compromising on performance.
  • Integrations
    It seamlessly integrates with numerous applications and technologies, including cloud services, databases, ERP systems, and more, which makes it versatile across different IT landscapes.
  • Advanced Automation Features
    Provides advanced automation capabilities such as predictive analytics, machine learning, and DR capabilities that enhance efficiency and reduce manual intervention.
  • Robust Reporting
    Offers powerful reporting tools and dashboards that provide actionable insights and visibility into job performance and system health.

Possible disadvantages of Control-M

  • Cost
    The comprehensive features and enterprise-level capabilities come at a high cost, which may be prohibitive for smaller organizations.
  • Complexity in Initial Setup
    The initial installation and configuration can be complex and require significant investment in time and resources to set up properly.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the depth and breadth of features can result in a steep learning curve for new users, necessitating substantial training.
  • Resource Intensive
    Control-M can be resource-intensive, requiring considerable computing resources to run efficiently, which might be a constraint for organizations with limited IT infrastructure.
  • Dependency on Vendor Support
    While support is robust, the complexity of the system can sometimes necessitate frequent interaction with vendor support, which can be time-consuming.
  • Customization Challenges
    While the tool is highly configurable, extensive customization can become complicated and may require professional services or advanced knowledge.

RunDeck features and specs

  • Open Source
    RunDeck is open-source, allowing for extensive customization and integration with various tools and services to meet specific requirements.
  • Web-based Interface
    RunDeck offers an intuitive web-based interface for managing and automating tasks, making it accessible and user-friendly.
  • Scheduling and Execution
    It provides powerful scheduling capabilities, allowing users to automate routine tasks and execute them at predefined times.
  • Plugins and Integrations
    RunDeck supports a wide range of plugins and integrations with popular tools such as Ansible, Chef, Docker, and more, extending its functionality.
  • Role-based Access Control (RBAC)
    It includes robust security features like RBAC, enabling fine-grained control over user permissions and access to different operations.
  • Audit Logging
    Provides comprehensive logging and auditing capabilities, helping organizations track changes and maintain compliance.
  • Community Support
    Being part of an open-source project, RunDeck has an active community that contributes to its development and offers support through forums and other channels.

Possible disadvantages of RunDeck

  • Learning Curve
    For newcomers, especially those unfamiliar with automation tools, there can be a steep learning curve to understand and effectively utilize all of RunDeck's features.
  • Complexity in Large Environments
    Managing large numbers of nodes and complex workflows can become cumbersome and may require significant effort to maintain and troubleshoot.
  • Limited Built-in Integrations
    While RunDeck supports many plugins, the built-in integrations may not cover all tools, requiring custom development or third-party plugins.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running multiple jobs and handling numerous nodes can introduce performance overhead, potentially affecting execution times and efficiency.
  • UI Limitations
    Some users may find the user interface limited in terms of advanced features and customization options compared to other enterprise automation tools.
  • Cost for Enterprise Features
    While the core RunDeck is open-source, advanced enterprise features and professional support are available only in the paid version, which could be a barrier for some organizations.

Control-M videos

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

RunDeck videos

Intro To Rundeck

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Control-M and RunDeck)
IT Automation
69 69%
31% 31
DevOps Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Continuous Integration And Delivery

User comments

Share your experience with using Control-M and RunDeck. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Control-M and RunDeck

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

RunDeck Reviews

13 tools to use for DevSecOps automation
🔓 Rundeck is an open-source runbook automation tool for incident management, business continuity, and self-service operations. This tool is typically used in security and compliance, helping organizations maintain compliance controls, control access to sensitive data, and audit activity logs. Use the Rundeck node to automatically execute jobs and get their metadata.
Source: n8n.io
35+ Of The Best CI/CD Tools: Organized By Category
RunDeck is an operations automation platform. It doesn’t just manage deployments but several processes in the CI/CD pipeline. It’s great for creating standard operating procedures and synchronizing actions across all your enterprise’s various scripts, tools, and APIs. RunDeck is particularly suited for companies planning to migrate to cloud services.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Control-M and RunDeck, you can also consider the following products

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

Puppet Enterprise - Get started with Puppet Enterprise, or upgrade or expand.

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

Terraform - Tool for building, changing, and versioning infrastructure safely and efficiently.

SECDO - SECDO offers automated endpoint security and incident response solutions

Rancher - Open Source Platform for Running a Private Container Service