Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

COCO Simulator VS Aspen Plus

Compare COCO Simulator VS Aspen Plus and see what are their differences

COCO Simulator logo COCO Simulator

COCO (CAPE-OPEN to CAPE-OPEN) is a free-of-charge CAPE-OPEN compliant steady-state simulation...

Aspen Plus logo Aspen Plus

Maximize profits using a plant-wide simulation solution that combines unparalleled accuracy and engineering collaboration with time-saving workflows.
  • COCO Simulator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-10-16
  • Aspen Plus Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-30

COCO Simulator features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    COCO Simulator provides a user-friendly interface that makes it accessible to a wide range of users, including those who may not have extensive experience with process simulation software.
  • Open Source Platform
    Being an open-source platform, COCO Simulator allows users to freely access, modify, and share the software, promoting collaboration and transparency.
  • Modularity
    The simulator's modular architecture enables users to incorporate various components and customize simulations according to their specific needs.
  • Comprehensive Capabilities
    COCO Simulator supports a wide range of unit operations and thermodynamic models, making it versatile for simulating different chemical processes.
  • Cost-Effective
    As a free resource, COCO Simulator is a cost-effective solution for both educational and professional purposes, avoiding the financial burden of expensive commercial software.

Possible disadvantages of COCO Simulator

  • Limited Technical Support
    As an open-source tool, users might experience limited technical support compared to commercial alternatives, potentially leading to slower troubleshooting and issue resolution.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, users without prior experience in process simulation might still encounter a steep learning curve due to the complexity of chemical engineering concepts involved.
  • Potential for Compatibility Issues
    Integrating COCO Simulator with other proprietary software systems could present compatibility challenges, requiring additional effort for seamless interoperability.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to some high-end commercial software, COCO Simulator might lack certain advanced features and functionalities needed for very complex simulations.
  • Community-Driven Updates
    Updates and new features rely on community contributions, which can lead to unpredictable development timelines and potentially slower implementation of new advancements.

Aspen Plus features and specs

  • Comprehensive Process Modeling
    Aspen Plus offers a robust suite of tools for simulating a wide range of chemical processes, making it ideal for detailed process modeling and optimization.
  • Advanced Thermodynamic Models
    The software includes a wide array of thermodynamic models that accurately represent the physical and chemical properties of substances involved in diverse processes.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Aspen Plus can be integrated with other tools and databases, facilitating seamless data exchange and comprehensive analysis across multiple industrial functions.
  • Large User Community
    Aspen Plus is widely used in the industry, providing a vast community for support, resource sharing, and collaboration.
  • High Customizability
    Users can customize their simulations using scripting and user-added functionality to address specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Aspen Plus

  • Expensive Licensing
    Aspen Plus comes with a high licensing cost, which may be prohibitive for smaller companies or academic institutions.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its complexity and vast features, new users may find it challenging to learn and effectively use without significant training.
  • Complex Interface
    The user interface can be overwhelming for beginners due to its complexity and the number of available options.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running simulations on Aspen Plus can be resource-intensive, requiring powerful computer hardware to ensure efficient operation.
  • Annual Maintenance Fees
    In addition to the initial cost, there are ongoing maintenance fees for software updates and support.

COCO Simulator videos

No COCO Simulator videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Aspen Plus videos

Quick Review of Aspen Plus Simulation Software

More videos:

  • Review - Unboxing and Assembly of NCM Aspen Plus

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to COCO Simulator and Aspen Plus)
Simulation Software
50 50%
50% 50
Technical Computing
33 33%
67% 67
Monitoring Tools
61 61%
39% 39
Numerical Computation
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using COCO Simulator and Aspen Plus. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing COCO Simulator and Aspen Plus, you can also consider the following products

CHEMCAD - We equip chemical engineers with integrated and intuitive process simulation software to tackle projects large and small. Discover how CHEMCAD can help you design, analyze and measure simple and complex processes like never before.

DWSIM - DWSIM is an open-source CAPE-OPEN compliant chemical process simulator for Windows and Linux.

Aspen HYSYS - Aspen HYSYS is a software solution for chemical process simulation and modeling.

Engineering Equation Solver - EES (pronounced 'ease') is a general equation-solving program that can numerically solve...

CADSIM Plus - CADSIM Plus is a chemical process modeling and simulation software capable of simulating detailed furnace assemblies and associated equipment.

gPROMS - Oil and Gas Simulation and Modeling