Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CMake VS Meson

Compare CMake VS Meson and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

CMake logo CMake

CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Meson logo Meson

Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...
  • CMake Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-21

We recommend LibHunt CMake for discovery and comparisons of trending CMake projects.

  • Meson Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-04

CMake features and specs

  • Cross-platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This allows developers to write platform-independent CMake scripts.
  • Build tool agnostic
    CMake can generate build files for a variety of build systems including Makefiles, Ninja, and Visual Studio solutions. This means developers are not tied to a specific build tool.
  • Large community and extensive documentation
    CMake has a large user base and an extensive amount of documentation and tutorials available which can be helpful for new and experienced users alike.
  • Integrated testing support
    CMake includes support for testing frameworks such as CTest, which allows for automated testing of code during the build process.
  • Modular and scalable
    CMake is highly modular, enabling users to create reusable and maintainable code by organizing CMake scripts into libraries and modules.

Possible disadvantages of CMake

  • Steep learning curve
    CMake's complexity and its extensive range of features can be difficult for beginners to grasp, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Verbose syntax
    CMake scripts can often become verbose and difficult to read, especially for large projects. This can make maintenance and debugging challenging.
  • Inconsistent module quality
    The quality and support of different CMake modules can vary, sometimes leading to issues with compatibility or functionality.
  • Performance overhead
    CMake may introduce some performance overhead during the configuration process, especially for very large projects.
  • Complexity in advanced features
    Some of the more advanced features of CMake, such as custom commands and complex dependency management, can be quite difficult to implement correctly.

Meson features and specs

  • Speed
    Meson is designed to be fast. It optimizes the build process to ensure efficient and rapid compilation, which can save considerable time in large projects.
  • Ease of Use
    Meson uses a simple syntax that is easy to learn and understand, making it accessible for both new and experienced developers.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Meson supports multiple platforms including Linux, Windows, and macOS, allowing for consistent build processes across different operating systems.
  • Ninja Backend
    Meson uses Ninja as its backend build system, which is known for its efficiency and speed, particularly in incremental builds.
  • Dependency Management
    Meson has built-in support for handling dependencies, making it easier to manage complex projects with multiple libraries.
  • Modern Language Support
    Meson is designed to support modern programming languages such as C, C++, Fortran, and Rust, as well as many others.
  • Extensibility
    Meson allows for custom build definitions and extensions, providing flexibility to address specific needs and workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Meson

  • Learning Curve
    While Meson's syntax is simple, there can be a learning curve for developers accustomed to other build systems like CMake or Make.
  • Smaller Community
    Meson has a smaller community compared to more established tools like CMake, which can lead to fewer available resources and third-party modules.
  • Limited IDE Integration
    Although Meson supports several IDEs, the level of integration may not be as comprehensive as that available for more mainstream build systems.
  • Transition Overhead
    Projects transitioning from another build system to Meson may experience some overhead in terms of time and effort needed to reconfigure their build setup.
  • Dependency on Ninja
    Being heavily reliant on the Ninja build system can be a limitation if Ninja is not well-supported or preferred in some environments.

CMake videos

+ Add

CMake for Dummies

More videos:

  • Review - CppCon 2017: Mathieu Ropert “Using Modern CMake Patterns to Enforce a Good Modular Design”
  • Review - Hunter, a CMake driven package manager for C/C++ projects - Daniel Friedrich - Lightning Talks

Meson videos

+ Add

Meson RTA by Newgen Vape - Flavour Banger - Review & Rebuild

More videos:

  • Tutorial - MESON RTA by NEWGEN - Review & Build Tutorial!
  • Review - NewGen Vape Meson RTA Review - ...it's all down to the price...

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CMake and Meson)

CMake

Meson

Front End Package Manager
66 66%
Front End Package Manager
34% 34
JavaScript Package Manager
62 62%
JavaScript Package Manager
38% 38
JS Build Tools
62 62%
JS Build Tools
38% 38
Continuous Integration
58 58%
Continuous Integration
42% 42

User comments

Share your experience with using CMake and Meson. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

CMake might be a bit more popular than Meson. We know about 53 links to it since March 2021 and only 44 links to Meson. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CMake mentions (53)

  • Master This Feature of DevEco Studio to Efficiently Implement ArkTS and C++ Glue Code
    For knowledge in this aspect, you can refer to the relevant documents of the CMake build tool: https://cmake.org/. - Source: dev.to / 14 days ago
  • Creating a Native Desktop GUI Using C++ with GTK
    I used CMAKE to define the build configurations. I find it very convenient that CMAKE generates the Makefile on Linux and can also create a Visual Studio project on Windows. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Top 7 C++ Tools to explore in 2024 if it's not already the case.
    CMake stands for "Cross-platform Make" and is an open-source, platform-independent build system. It's designed to build, test, and package software projects written in C and C++, but it can also be used for other languages. Here's an overview of CMake and its features:. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • My first Software Release using GitHub Release
    When doing research for this lab exercise I looked at both vcpkg and conan. Both are package managers that would automate the installation and configuration of my program with its dependencies. However, when it came to releasing and sharing my program my options were limited. For example, the central public registry for conan packages is conan-center, but these packages are curated and the process is very... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • A little help for a C++ newbie
    Install the CMake program using your system package manager, e.g. Sudo apt-get install cmake. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

Meson mentions (44)

  • cargo-c common questions
    With cargo-c I try to use the best practices to support as many platform as possible, trying to stay in sync with what meson does. Sadly what is conceptually trivial, installing a package, has lots of details that are platform-specific. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Rust Without Crates.io
    I went to mesonbuild.org and it doesn't match the description (some sort of betting site? I didn't stick around ...), and a search turned up: https://mesonbuild.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Makefile Tutorial
    Came here to post the same. The answer for How to build software? is Meson[1] for C and C++ and also other languages. Works well on Windows and Mac, too. I’ve written a small Makefile to learn the basic and backgrounds. Make is fine. But the next high-level would have been Autotools, which is an intimidating and weird set of tools. Most new stuff written in C/C++ use now Meson and it feels sane. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • CMake x make?
    If you are very fortunate, you'll be able to choose something else. I like meson myself: it looks a bit like python, it's popular, small, simple, well-documented, easy to install and update, and it works well everywhere. Source: over 1 year ago
  • C++ Papercuts
    I suggest changing the build tool. Meson improved C and C++ a lot: https://mesonbuild.com/ The dependency declaration and auto-detection is nice. But the hidden extra is WrapDB, built-in package management (if wanted): 
        https://mesonbuild.com/Wrap-dependency-system-manual.html.
    - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CMake and Meson, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

SBT - SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.

Apache Maven - Apache Maven is a project comprehension and management software tool.

Gradle - Accelerate developer productivity. Gradle helps teams build, automate and deliver better software, faster. DocsExplore the documentation of Gradle. Find installation ..

Loading...