Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

BeeGFS VS GlusterFS

Compare BeeGFS VS GlusterFS and see what are their differences

BeeGFS logo BeeGFS

  Download What is BeeGFS? BeeGFS (formerly FhGFS) is a parallel cluster file system, developed with a strong focus on performance and designed for very easy installation and management.

GlusterFS logo GlusterFS

GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.
  • BeeGFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-05
  • GlusterFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-10

BeeGFS features and specs

  • Performance
    BeeGFS is designed for high-performance computing environments, delivering excellent data throughput and low latency. It efficiently manages parallel I/O and is well-suited for handling large volumes of data in a distributed file system.
  • Scalability
    The architecture of BeeGFS allows it to scale efficiently both horizontally and vertically, making it capable of handling growing amounts of data by adding more servers and storage devices without significant restructuring.
  • Flexibility
    BeeGFS supports a range of storage configurations and can be integrated with various types of storage hardware. It also offers flexibility in its deployment, working in diverse environments and allowing easy configuration changes.
  • Ease of Use
    It provides user-friendly tools and comprehensive documentation that aid in the installation, configuration, and maintenance of the file system, making it accessible even to organizations without extensive HPC expertise.
  • Community and Support
    BeeGFS has a strong community and professional support options, including a range of expert services and resources, ensuring users can get help and advice when needed.

Possible disadvantages of BeeGFS

  • Cost
    While BeeGFS has open-source components, certain features and support options may require licensing fees or additional costs, which could be a consideration for budget-conscious organizations.
  • Complexity
    Despite its ease of use, the initial setup and configuration of a distributed file system like BeeGFS can be complex and may require skilled personnel to optimize performance and reliability.
  • Specific Use Cases
    BeeGFS is specifically designed for high-performance and technical computing environments. Organizations with more general-purpose needs might find its capabilities exceeding their requirements.
  • Hardware Dependency
    The performance benefits of BeeGFS might heavily depend on the underlying hardware configuration, potentially necessitating investment in high-performance storage and networking infrastructure.
  • Potential Overhead
    Like any distributed file system, there might be computational and network overheads associated with maintaining the distributed metadata and managing parallel I/O operations, possibly impacting performance if not managed properly.

GlusterFS features and specs

  • Scalability
    GlusterFS can easily scale out by adding more servers to the cluster, allowing it to handle increasing amounts of data and traffic.
  • Distributed File System
    It provides a distributed file system, enabling data replication and distribution across multiple nodes, which enhances data availability and reliability.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, GlusterFS provides flexibility and freedom for customization to fit specific needs without the cost associated with proprietary solutions.
  • POSIX Compliance
    GlusterFS is POSIX-compliant, meaning it supports standard file system operations, which makes it easier to integrate with existing applications and systems.
  • High Availability
    With built-in features like self-healing and replication, GlusterFS ensures that data remains available and consistent even in the event of hardware failures.
  • Geographical Distribution
    It supports geographical distribution of data, which is beneficial for disaster recovery and accessing data from multiple locations.

Possible disadvantages of GlusterFS

  • Performance Overhead
    Due to its distributed nature, GlusterFS might introduce performance overhead, particularly for workloads requiring low-latency or high-throughput.
  • Complexity in Management
    Managing a GlusterFS cluster can be complex, requiring in-depth knowledge of the system to properly configure and troubleshoot issues.
  • Latency Issues
    Latency can become a significant issue, especially in write-heavy applications or when nodes are geographically distant.
  • Resource Intensive
    GlusterFS can be resource-intensive, requiring significant CPU and memory resources to manage its distributed architecture and ensure data consistency.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Compared to other distributed file systems, GlusterFS may lack some advanced features like native support for certain storage protocols or comprehensive storage tiering.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around GlusterFS, the level and speed of community support may not match that of commercially-backed solutions.

BeeGFS videos

BeeGFS High Availability Features with Built in Monitoring - Oriol Mula Valls, HPCNow!

More videos:

  • Review - Transtec: Delivering BeeGFS for High Performance Computing
  • Review - Hussein N. Harake (CSCS) - Evaluation of BeeGFS parallel filesystem

GlusterFS videos

An Overview of GlusterFS Architecture Part 2 - Non-replicated Cluster

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BeeGFS and GlusterFS)
Cloud Storage
32 32%
68% 68
Storage
38 38%
62% 62
Cloud Computing
29 29%
71% 71
File Sharing
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using BeeGFS and GlusterFS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare BeeGFS and GlusterFS

BeeGFS Reviews

Ceph Storage Platform Alternatives in 2022
BeeGFS is a hardware-independent POSIX parallel file system (a.k.a Software-defined Parallel Storage) developed with a strong focus on performance and designed for ease of use, simple installation, and management. BeeGFS is created on an Available Source development model (source code is publicly available), offering a self-supported Community Edition and a fully supported...

GlusterFS Reviews

We have no reviews of GlusterFS yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GlusterFS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BeeGFS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of BeeGFS yet. Tracking of BeeGFS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

GlusterFS mentions (2)

  • [D] What are the compute options you've considered for your projects?
    I am a fan of Gearman to schedule and dispatch distributed jobs, Redis as a collaborative blackboard, and GlusterFS to share models across multiple systems and make bulk data available across the entire system (usually referenced in the blackboard as a pathname). Source: over 1 year ago
  • Gluster vs Oracle Gluster
    If you're not relying on support, then I would probably standardize on the latest packages available from gluster.org. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BeeGFS and GlusterFS, you can also consider the following products

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

rkt - App Container runtime

Seaweed FS - SeaweedFS is a simple and highly scalable distributed file system to store and serve billions of files fast! SeaweedFS object store has O(1) disk seek and SeaweedFS Filer supports cross-cluster replication, POSIX, S3 API, ,…

MooseFS - MooseFS is a fault tolerant, network distributed file system.

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.