Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Ansible Semaphore VS Foreman

Compare Ansible Semaphore VS Foreman and see what are their differences

IsDown.app
Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured
This page does not exist
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Ansible Semaphore logo Ansible Semaphore

Modern UI for Ansible

Foreman logo Foreman

Foreman is an open source project that helps system administrators manage servers throughout their...
  • Ansible Semaphore Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-09

If your project has grown and deploying from the terminal is no longer for you then Ansible Semaphore is what you need.

  • Foreman Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-29

Ansible Semaphore features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Foreman features and specs

  • Comprehensive Management
    Foreman provides a complete lifecycle management tool for physical and virtual servers, including provisioning, configuration management, and monitoring.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with a variety of configuration management tools like Puppet, Ansible, Chef, and Salt, offering flexibility in how you manage your infrastructure.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source tool, Foreman allows for customization and community-driven improvements with no licensing costs.
  • Extensible
    Foreman has a plug-in architecture that allows for additional functionality and integrations, making it adaptable to complex environments.
  • GUI and CLI
    Foreman offers both a web-based graphical user interface (GUI) and command-line interface (CLI), catering to different user preferences and use cases.
  • Community and Documentation
    It enjoys an active community and extensive documentation, which can help in troubleshooting and extending functionalities.

Possible disadvantages of Foreman

  • Complexity
    Due to its comprehensive nature and numerous features, Foreman can be complex to set up and configure, requiring a significant time investment.
  • Performance
    In larger environments, performance issues might arise. Effective scaling often requires careful tuning and additional resources.
  • Learning Curve
    The extensive functionality and integration options come with a steep learning curve, which can be challenging for new users.
  • Dependency Management
    Foreman has multiple dependencies, making its installation and maintenance more cumbersome, especially in environments with strict configuration standards.
  • Interface Complexity
    The web interface can be overwhelming with its vast array of options and settings, potentially complicating routine tasks for less experienced users.
  • Limited Support for Non-Linux OS
    Foreman's support for managing non-Linux operating systems is limited compared to its robust capabilities with Linux-based systems.

Ansible Semaphore videos

+ Add

Ansible Semaphore - Modern Ansible UI

Foreman videos

No Foreman videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ansible Semaphore and Foreman)

Ansible Semaphore

Foreman

DevOps Tools
30 30%
DevOps Tools
70% 70
Continuous Integration
100 100%
Continuous Integration
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
Monitoring Tools
100% 100
IT Automation
38 38%
IT Automation
62% 62

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing Ansible Semaphore and Foreman.

What makes your product unique?

Ansible Semaphore's answer

Easy to install, easy to setup, easy to use.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Ansible Semaphore's answer

Easy to install, easy to setup, easy to use.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Ansible Semaphore's answer

Golang, Vue.js, BoltDB

User comments

Share your experience with using Ansible Semaphore and Foreman. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Ansible Semaphore and Foreman

Ansible Semaphore Reviews

  1. fiftin
    · Developer at Fastlix ·
    Lightweight alternative for AWX

    Use Semaphore 3+ years, very stable, useful and lightweight. No need Docker.

    🏁 Competitors: AWX, RunDeck

Foreman Reviews

12 Open Source/Commercial Software for Data Center Infrastructure Management
Foreman is an open-source and perfect life-cycle management application for physical and virtual servers, that give Linux system administrators the capability to easily automate repetitive jobs, rapidly deploy applications, and proactively manage servers, on-premise or in the cloud.
Source: www.tecmint.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Foreman should be more popular than Ansible Semaphore. It has been mentiond 19 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ansible Semaphore mentions (2)

  • Need User interface for managing and running the ansible playbooks.
    Once you have tower or awx you can throw away jenkins. No more silliness of groovy and java when you have python and ssh based actions For UI try Semaphore - https://github.com/ansible-semaphore/semaphore. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Automatic softwaredeployment & installation/updating Tool
    Googled and found this: https://github.com/ansible-semaphore/semaphore. Source: almost 3 years ago

Foreman mentions (19)

  • From Dotenv to Dotenvx: Next Generation Config Management
    Not to be confused with the larger foreman[0] also written in ruby. [0] https://theforeman.org. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Deploying 100+ windows 10 devices per week. Need to automate.
    In case you're unable to use intune, a free approach might be https://theforeman.org/ That works well for provisioning baremetal windows (with discovery image or pxe boot) once you've set it up. It supports script access as well as a nice hierarchy for configurations. But it's really not as well documented as it should be. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Configuration Management Tools for 20-30 servers
    I use the foreman with puppet and pxe/kickstart scripts to automate VM/baremetal provisioning etc. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Server management tool with GUI
    Might want to look into https://theforeman.org/ if it's not too complex for you. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Stockpiling Linux ISOs?
    The iso images are typically locked at a certain verison. The update repositories sounds like what you are looking for to cache updates. Look into theforeman.org and specifically the plugin Katello. This is an upstream for Red Hat's Satellite product. Another option would be Canonical's MAAS. Both of these options Sound like what you are headed for unless you really just mean synchronize into a folder and store... Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ansible Semaphore and Foreman, you can also consider the following products

RunDeck - RunDeck is an open source automation service with a web console, command line tools and a WebAPI.

DCImanager - DCImanager is a platform for managing physical equipment. Connect any physical equipment to a single platform. Use the platform to manage your servers, switches, PDU as well as physical and virtual networks.

AWX - Centralize and control your IT infrastructure with a visual dashboard

Ansible - Radically simple configuration-management, application deployment, task-execution, and multi-node orchestration engine

Ansible tower - An ansible web frontend.

NetBox - NetBox is an open source web application designed to help manage and document computer networks. NetBox was developed specifically to address the needs of network and infrastructure engineers.

Loading...